The yearly report on calorie counting apps

Method

How we compare

Maintained by Imogen Hartley · Last reviewed October 22, 2026

Each app gets a grade from A to C on five criteria. The criteria are chosen around one idea: the calorie counter that helps you is the one you keep using, so speed and data quality come first.

The five criteria

CriterionWhat earns an A
Logging speedHow quickly you can count a real meal: barcode for packages, photo for plates, voice for drinks, search for everything else. More fast methods in one diary scores higher.
Food dataWhether entries are verified or crowd-sourced, and how much branded, barcode and restaurant data there is. Duplicate and user-typed entries score lower.
Free planWhat you can do forever without paying. A trial scores as no free plan.
Nutrient detailHow many nutrients each entry shows beyond calories and macros.
ValueWhat the paid plan costs per year in the US and what it unlocks, compared with the rest of the field.

How grades are given

A means best in the field or level with the best. B means good, with a clear gap to the leader. C means usable but behind. Grades are editorial judgments, not lab measurements, and they are the same for every report on the site.

Sources

Features, plans and prices come from each company's own website, help center and app-store listings. US prices are printed with the date they were checked. If a company does not describe a feature in a way we can confirm, we write a dash instead of guessing.

Payments and changes

No app pays for a grade or a position. Links go to each company's own site or app-store page. Changes after publication are listed in the changelog.